Fair Shares and Selective Attention
نویسندگان
چکیده
Attitudes towards fairness and redistribution differ along socio-economic lines, resulting in political conflict. To understand the formation of such views find levers to affect them, we study role attention. In a large online experiment, investigate how subjects allocate their visual attention contributions merit luck generation surplus they decide on its division. We that who randomly obtained an advantaged position pay less information about true retain more surplus. Both attentional behavioral patterns persist, although with smaller effect sizes, when dictators subsequently divide money between pairs disadvantaged benevolent judge. Moreover, has substantial causal effect: forcing look for one second at relative overall outcomes reduces having allocations by 25%. These findings open new window cleavages attitudes redistribution, suggest attention-based policy interventions may be effective reducing polarized inequality.
منابع مشابه
Resource scarcity, fair shares and development
A WWF/Oxfam discussion paper-Alex Evans Purpose This discussion paper is intended to contribute to the evolving debate on the links between resource scarcity and international development, in particular by focusing on the issues of equity and " fair shares " for poor people and poor countries that arise in the context of resource limits and environmental boundaries. It provides a short overview...
متن کاملX Fair Enough: Guaranteeing Approximate Maximin Shares
We consider the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, focusing on a recently-introduced notion of fairness called maximin share guarantee: Each player’s value for his allocation should be at least as high as what he can guarantee by dividing the items into as many bundles as there are players and receiving his least desirable bundle. Assuming additive valuation functions, we show that...
متن کاملFair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions
Everyone has observed people invoking fairness arguments in defense of their opinions or actions, and it is not uncommon for such arguments to be wielded on both sides of an issue about which views conflict. For example, during a televised debate Representative Charles B. Rangel said, “I think [Affirmative Action] has to involve a search for fairness,” whereas commentator Avi Nelson opined that...
متن کاملThe win-win solution - guaranteeing fair shares to everybody
Spend your few moment to read a book even only few pages. Reading book is not obligation and force for everybody. When you don't want to read, you can get punishment from the publisher. Read a book becomes a choice of your different characteristics. Many people with reading habit will always be enjoyable to read, or on the contrary. For some reasons, this win win solution guaranteeing fair shar...
متن کاملAccess to coronary catheterisation: fair shares for all?
OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of patient's sex and area's material deprivation on utilisation rates of coronary catheterisation and angiography in the investigation of ischaemic heart disease. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of routinely collected hospital statistics. SETTING Acute hospitals throughout Northern Ireland. SUBJECTS 24,179 episodes of patients discharged from hospital with...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1556-5068']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3890037